Jon Wilner
Welcome to our post-spring assessment of Pac-12 quarterback depth in 2022.
For some teams, the situation has evolved since the initial Quarterback Comfort Quotient (QBCQ) rankings were published in February. For others, the depth chart remains as it was, but the team’s relative position in the conference has changed.
To determine the QBCQ, we consider the caliber of the starter and the reliability of the backups, because you never know when the former will falter (or get injured) and the entire season will depend on the latter.
Case in point: The 2021 Utah Utes, whose Pac-12 championship-winning quarterback, Cam Rising, began the season on the bench.
Please note:
— Not all backups are listed below, only those we believe are relevant for 2022.
— If the projected starter is a newcomer — and that’s the case for most of the conference — his previous school has been listed.
— The Hotline will publish our third and final QBCQ of ’22 at the conclusion of training camp.
1. UCLA
Previous ranking: 1 
Projected starter: Dorian Thompson-Robinson
Backups: Ethan Garbers, Chase Griffin, Justyn Martin
Comment: We continue to rate UCLA’s quarterback depth chart as the best in the conference after all the comings and goings through the spring. Thompson-Robinson was an all-Pac-12 selection last year and should play at a high level again, but what separates the Bruins is their bench: If an unexpected event forced Garbers to take command on a permanent basis, UCLA would be in solid shape. Even Griffin has proven capable when called upon.
2. Utah
Previous: 3
Projected starter: Cameron Rising
Backups: Bryson Barnes, Ja’Quinden Jackson
Comment: We hesitate to place much stock in a single performance … unless it’s the final 10 minutes of the Rose Bowl against Ohio State. Barnes’ poise in place of the injured Rising during the tense finish would suggest the Utes have a solid backup plan if one of the league’s best starters were lost for an extended period of time. The Utes are well-stocked at most positions — they are the Hotline’s pick to win the South — and that includes quarterback.
3. USC
Previous: 2
Projected starter: Caleb Williams (Oklahoma)
Backup: Miller Moss
Comment: The Trojans are in great shape atop their depth chart with Williams, but the situation turns a tad perilous from there. Moss was a four-star recruit who had numerous high-level scholarship offers but has played in one game and attempted just 13 passes. And for the moment, Moss is the only scholarship reserve. (Third-stringer Mo Hasan has a ruptured Achilles.) Perhaps the transfer portal will deliver a backup for the backup.
4. Arizona
Previous: 4
Projected starter: Jayden de Laura (Washington State)
Backups: Noah Fifita, Jordan McCloud
Comment: No change here as the Wildcats remain on course for a significant upgrade to their QBCQ on both fronts: the quality of the starter and the reliability of the backup. De Laura played at an all-conference level for the Cougars and should make a smooth adjustment to Arizona’s system, while McCloud, who has 500 career attempts at Arizona and USF, stands as one of the top No. 2s in the conference.
5. Washington
Previous: 7
Projected starter: Michael Penix Jr. (Indiana)
Backups: Dylan Morris, Sam Huard
Comment: The transfer window has closed, and Morris remains on the roster despite the likelihood of losing his job to Penix. That’s a good thing for the depth chart: The Huskies are one of the few teams with an experienced backup and the only team whose third-stringer is a former five-star recruit. But quality depth is merely one piece of the QBCQ — high-level play from the starter matters, too. And on that front, we are slightly skeptical.
6. Stanford
Previous: 8
Projected starter: Tanner McKee
Backups: Ari Patu
Comment: We envision McKee as one of the top quarterbacks in the conference — and a potential high-round draft pick — but cannot ignore his skinny frame, lack of mobility, wobbly offensive line and the potential for injury. Patu attempted just 16 passes in his rookie season. The Cardinal stands as a classic QBCQ case study: It has no reason to worry about its quarterback play, unless it has reason to panic.
7. Washington State
Previous: 10
Projected starter: Cam Ward (Incarnate Word)
Backup: Xavier Ward
Comment: To say we’re bullish on Cam Ward’s first season in the conference is an understatement. He might develop into the best quarterback in the North and a Pac-12 Player of the Year candidate. That said, we’re bearish on WSU’s depth. With presumed backup Victor Gabalis recently entering the transfer portal, the Cougars are in dire shape if Ward misses meaningful time. None of the other quarterbacks have game experience.
8. Oregon State
Previous: 5
Projected starter: Chance Nolan
Backups: Tristan Gebbia, Ben Gulbranson
Comment: Nolan will enter training camp as the clear favorite for the job, yet we cannot help but wonder about the state of OSU’s quarterback room. Nolan was solid last season, not elite (19 touchdowns, 10 interceptions); Gebbia is a former starter — and that counts for something — but he hasn’t played in 21 months because of injury; and Gulbranson owns just nine career attempts. Admittedly, this ranking could require an adjustment upward in August.
9. Oregon
Previous: 6
Projected starter: Bo Nix (Auburn)
Backups: Ty Thompson, Jay Butterfield
Comment: Nix appeared to take control of the competition with his performance in spring practice and just might thrive under offensive coordinator Kenny Dillingham. But we need to see it. In three seasons at Auburn, Nix never completed more than 61 percent of his passes, and his yards-per-attempt last season (7.1) was one of the lowest in the Power Five. No team in the conference has a wider range of potential outcomes for its quarterback play.
10. Cal
Previous: 11
Projected starter: Jack Plummer (Purdue)
Backups: Kai Millner, Zach Johnson
Comment: Plummer’s arrival as a grad transfer with two years of eligibility remaining provides a veteran option to replace Chase Garbers. But we’re not prepared to declare a quarterback upgrade in Berkeley just yet. Plummer started for Purdue and owns 500 career attempts, but he was benched midway through last season. The Bears would be slotted a tad higher in the QBCQ except for the inexperienced options behind Plummer.
11. Arizona State
Previous: 9
Projected starter: Emory Jones (Florida)
Backups: Trenton Bourget, Paul Tyson, Daylin McLemore
Comment: The Sun Devils are better positioned than they were before Jones arrived but worse off than before Jayden Daniels left for LSU in February. Jones has plenty of SEC starting experience, but the results were mixed. Remove his six-touchdown performance against Samford, and he finished the 2021 season with 13 touchdowns and 13 interceptions. His mobility and savvy will serve ASU well, but we prefer the wait-and-see mode.
12. Colorado
Previous: 12
Projected starter: Brendon Lewis
Backups: J.T. Shrout, Maddox Kopp, Drew Carter
Comment: The clear pick for the QBCQ cellar until we have full clarity with the pecking order and evidence of improvement. Lewis was erratic last season (albeit behind a substandard line). Will his efficiency reach a respectable level under a new coordinator (Mike Sanford)? And how seriously will Shrout contend for the starting job in training camp, assuming his rebuilt knee is cleared for full contact? CU needs someone to push Lewis.
Support the Hotline: Receive three months of unlimited access for just 99 cents. Yep, that’s 99 cents for 90 days, with the option to cancel anytime. Details are here, and thanks for your support.
*** Send suggestions, comments and tips (confidentiality guaranteed) to pac12hotline@bayareanewsgroup.com or call 408-920-5716
*** Follow me on Twitter: @WilnerHotline
*** Pac-12 Hotline is not endorsed or sponsored by the Pac-12 Conference, and the views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Conference.
